As a systems
engineer (SE), one would have to listen to the point of view of each department
involved in the design process. First, both of the engineering teams (Guidance
and Navigation and Payload) would have to explain which commercial
off-the-shelf (COTS) components are not performing correctly. The engineers
would have to do an analysis on all of the components in their system, and use
carefully constructed flow charts to make sure all of the COTS equipment is
compliant to the system requirements.
Once the analysis
is complete, each subsystem would need to present their findings to the systems
engineering group through a PowerPoint presentation or a white paper. The SE
group would have to take these findings and check them against the requirements
for the system. If the components are not compliant to the system requirements,
then each subsystem group would have to go back and look for compliant
alternatives that satisfy the requirements. If they are all compliant, there
may have to be discussions about what equipment is critical and what is not as
critical to the overall design so that substitutions or deletions can be made
to meet the appropriate weight requirements. Both of these systems would have
to work in conjunction with the safety engineers; fuel margin takes priority
and should not be touched.
In addition to
working with the various engineering groups involved, systems would also have
to work with procurement and purchasing to discuss possible contractual changes
or budgetary changes with the customer. These discussions must take place prior
to any final design decisions being executed on the program.
As a result of the
findings on this program, it would be in the best decision of the contractor to
look into other options for the next generation. For instance, instead of going
with all COTS components, engineering could look into the amount of work and
budget required to outsource development of components or software. This could
save the program money and valuable weight margin, although it may require more
time and resources. However, this is usually a viable option for the contractor
as long as the customer is on board and contracts are agreed upon by both
sides.
No comments:
Post a Comment